selfdefensefamily:

We receive questions every day asking how we feel about such-and-such band. Often the focus is on how we feel about their success. “How do you feel about ________ blowing up?” or “What does it mean that _______ style of music is so big right now?” etc. 
I often refrain from answering those questions directly. Partly because not everyone likes their business in the street and I try to respect that. Also, I don’t want to seem like I’m cutting anyone down by being realistic. 
So here, I’m going to talk about “blowing up” in general terms and without naming bands. 
No one is blowing up. The success people perceive is exactly that: Perception. It’s usually a far cry from reality. 
A few days ago, I went out to eat with a friend who works in music. His label has made a couple bands a lot of money. And when I say, “a lot” I mean amounts that balance out to “per member salaries” putting them in an upper-middle class earning bracket. [Note: Those bands played “underground” shows but were never what any thinking person would consider bands tied to a subculture.]
“Everyone is jumping ship on pop-punk,” he told me. “Every band people thought would hit has been a dud. It keeps labels lights on, but no one is breaking through to larger audiences.”
He told me one current tour featuring some of the buzzier pop-punk acts has been doing 40% business on average. That means venues are half-full, which means guarantees are being paid out of pocket by promoters, which means the chances of those bands playing rooms that size again is nil. 
And those are the bands people thought they could count on. The tour is underwritten by a large name in that style of music. One that is supposed to know the market.  
If pop-punk isn’t a sound investment, think about hardcore and punk and underground metal. Do you believe there is a hardcore band playing in 2011 capable of living adult lives off the money being made? There isn’t. If you’re 18, it’s possible 15k seems like a lot to you. It’s not. And the bulk of bands are making FAR less than that, gross. 
And that word “gross” seems to be the thing no one understands. Net income, some bands do alright. But after the bills are paid, the take-home is terrible. 
When fans see a band sell “a lot” (there’s that word again) of merch, they don’t seem to understand that merch isn’t free. 1/3 of the money earned is going back to the merch company as payment. 
When fans see a band “pack a room” they don’t understand that the room has to be paid for by the promoter. 300 people (a funny number considering most “blowing up bands” are bringing fewer than 100) at $10 a head HAS NEVER equaled 3k in the band’s pocket. Support acts are being paid out of that. Room and security is being paid out from that. Hospitality is being paid out from that. Promoter profit is being paid out from that. And while $1,000 as a final takeaway sounds awesome, I want you to think about 5 adults splitting that money. Then I want you to think about the fact that it’s difficult to maintain that pace in any one country for more than 30 days as a headliner. Want to do a 60 day tour? You could ring the US three times during that period. Trust me, time number three will have significantly fewer humans than time number two.
So the band does support tours to put them in front of a new audience. That way they can continue touring the US without burning out their fans. But support acts make a fraction of what a headliner does. MANY support acts are chosen as a type of lowest-bid contracting. “Band _____ will do the tour for $100 a night,” says the supporting act’s booking agent. He/she is answered with, “Never heard of ‘em. Price is right though,” by the headliner’s booking agent. So that (possible) $1,000 a band was walking away with as a headliner is now a tenth of that as a supporting band.
The idea of a band “getting really big” is usually the product of a narrow field of vision. If you only expose yourself to media (including messageboards and Tumblr pages) that reinforce your expectations, you’ll come to believe they’re absolute. I just went to the Wikipedia page “List of Cognitive Biases” and had a difficult time deciding which one this belief was tied to; it seems rooted in at least six. So-and-so band is huge? They sold 3,000 records. That means fewer people bought their product than went into the Delaware Ave CVS in Delmar NY today. 
You can spot a true idiot when he/she asserts that, “it’s ok, because bands aren’t supposed to care about money or popularity; they should be in it for the music.” No shit. But the reality is that for a band to have instruments that transfer sound they need amps and both those things cost money. For bands to get to the shows they need a van and that van needs gas and both those things cost money. And that’s just the things people think of. Forget a bandmember’s personal bills, band debt, and a place to sleep when not on tour- ALL of which need to be hurdled before a band can consider itself a “functioning” act. And all of which need to be conquered before “blowing up” means anything other than, “Cool. This thing we do because we enjoy it has a few more people enjoying it. Neat, I guess, but as I was doing it for myself I only half care about that.”
People love the idea that the artists they use and dispose of like tampons are sacrificing everything for that privilege. 
I didn’t intend for this to be another rant from a broke band about how music doesn’t pay. The point is, WE ALL KNOW IT DOESN’T PAY. IT’S ANNOYING AS SHIT WHEN MUSIC FANS DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT FACT. And I don’t say this for myself. No one accuses us of blowing up. I say this on behalf of my friends in bands that are “blowing up” who have to read on messageboards about how much money they make because they got a write-up in a music magazine with a readership 1/10 of what it was a decade ago. Or because a concentrated effort of 20 people on Tumblr have them looking like everyone talks about them. Meanwhile, these dudes are sleeping on each other’s couches… in their mom’s basements. 
Naw, man. There isn’t a single “blowing up” band in “underground”. The ones doing the best are still on life-support with a ramen noodle IV drip. 
[Edit: Misspoke on “gross” in initial post. Corrected.]
[Edit 2: Wrong “their”. Holy shit. 

selfdefensefamily:

We receive questions every day asking how we feel about such-and-such band. Often the focus is on how we feel about their success. “How do you feel about ________ blowing up?” or “What does it mean that _______ style of music is so big right now?” etc. 

I often refrain from answering those questions directly. Partly because not everyone likes their business in the street and I try to respect that. Also, I don’t want to seem like I’m cutting anyone down by being realistic. 

So here, I’m going to talk about “blowing up” in general terms and without naming bands. 

No one is blowing up. The success people perceive is exactly that: Perception. It’s usually a far cry from reality. 

A few days ago, I went out to eat with a friend who works in music. His label has made a couple bands a lot of money. And when I say, “a lot” I mean amounts that balance out to “per member salaries” putting them in an upper-middle class earning bracket. [Note: Those bands played “underground” shows but were never what any thinking person would consider bands tied to a subculture.]

“Everyone is jumping ship on pop-punk,” he told me. “Every band people thought would hit has been a dud. It keeps labels lights on, but no one is breaking through to larger audiences.”

He told me one current tour featuring some of the buzzier pop-punk acts has been doing 40% business on average. That means venues are half-full, which means guarantees are being paid out of pocket by promoters, which means the chances of those bands playing rooms that size again is nil. 

And those are the bands people thought they could count on. The tour is underwritten by a large name in that style of music. One that is supposed to know the market.  

If pop-punk isn’t a sound investment, think about hardcore and punk and underground metal. Do you believe there is a hardcore band playing in 2011 capable of living adult lives off the money being made? There isn’t. If you’re 18, it’s possible 15k seems like a lot to you. It’s not. And the bulk of bands are making FAR less than that, gross. 

And that word “gross” seems to be the thing no one understands. Net income, some bands do alright. But after the bills are paid, the take-home is terrible. 

When fans see a band sell “a lot” (there’s that word again) of merch, they don’t seem to understand that merch isn’t free. 1/3 of the money earned is going back to the merch company as payment. 

When fans see a band “pack a room” they don’t understand that the room has to be paid for by the promoter. 300 people (a funny number considering most “blowing up bands” are bringing fewer than 100) at $10 a head HAS NEVER equaled 3k in the band’s pocket. Support acts are being paid out of that. Room and security is being paid out from that. Hospitality is being paid out from that. Promoter profit is being paid out from that. And while $1,000 as a final takeaway sounds awesome, I want you to think about 5 adults splitting that money. Then I want you to think about the fact that it’s difficult to maintain that pace in any one country for more than 30 days as a headliner. Want to do a 60 day tour? You could ring the US three times during that period. Trust me, time number three will have significantly fewer humans than time number two.

So the band does support tours to put them in front of a new audience. That way they can continue touring the US without burning out their fans. But support acts make a fraction of what a headliner does. MANY support acts are chosen as a type of lowest-bid contracting. “Band _____ will do the tour for $100 a night,” says the supporting act’s booking agent. He/she is answered with, “Never heard of ‘em. Price is right though,” by the headliner’s booking agent. So that (possible) $1,000 a band was walking away with as a headliner is now a tenth of that as a supporting band.

The idea of a band “getting really big” is usually the product of a narrow field of vision. If you only expose yourself to media (including messageboards and Tumblr pages) that reinforce your expectations, you’ll come to believe they’re absolute. I just went to the Wikipedia page “List of Cognitive Biases” and had a difficult time deciding which one this belief was tied to; it seems rooted in at least six. So-and-so band is huge? They sold 3,000 records. That means fewer people bought their product than went into the Delaware Ave CVS in Delmar NY today. 

You can spot a true idiot when he/she asserts that, “it’s ok, because bands aren’t supposed to care about money or popularity; they should be in it for the music.” No shit. But the reality is that for a band to have instruments that transfer sound they need amps and both those things cost money. For bands to get to the shows they need a van and that van needs gas and both those things cost money. And that’s just the things people think of. Forget a bandmember’s personal bills, band debt, and a place to sleep when not on tour- ALL of which need to be hurdled before a band can consider itself a “functioning” act. And all of which need to be conquered before “blowing up” means anything other than, “Cool. This thing we do because we enjoy it has a few more people enjoying it. Neat, I guess, but as I was doing it for myself I only half care about that.”

People love the idea that the artists they use and dispose of like tampons are sacrificing everything for that privilege. 

I didn’t intend for this to be another rant from a broke band about how music doesn’t pay. The point is, WE ALL KNOW IT DOESN’T PAY. IT’S ANNOYING AS SHIT WHEN MUSIC FANS DON’T UNDERSTAND THAT FACT. And I don’t say this for myself. No one accuses us of blowing up. I say this on behalf of my friends in bands that are “blowing up” who have to read on messageboards about how much money they make because they got a write-up in a music magazine with a readership 1/10 of what it was a decade ago. Or because a concentrated effort of 20 people on Tumblr have them looking like everyone talks about them. Meanwhile, these dudes are sleeping on each other’s couches… in their mom’s basements. 

Naw, man. There isn’t a single “blowing up” band in “underground”. The ones doing the best are still on life-support with a ramen noodle IV drip. 

[Edit: Misspoke on “gross” in initial post. Corrected.]

[Edit 2: Wrong “their”. Holy shit. 

  1. breakasweat reblogged this from deathwishinc
  2. fatalaikidoblow reblogged this from deathwishinc
  3. audiohawk reblogged this from selfdefensefamily
  4. wickercrown reblogged this from attheageofdecay
  5. toliveamongstbeasts reblogged this from selfdefensefamily
  6. misfit47 reblogged this from xahhx
  7. dotabata reblogged this from crushtor
  8. outmodedmedia reblogged this from selfdefensefamily
  9. crushtor reblogged this from longgoneloser and added:
    Excellent description. All rock fans - irrespective of how well entrenched you are in the “scene” or industry or not -...
  10. sonofsunrec reblogged this from deathwishinc
  11. brilliant-resilience reblogged this from sending-vesselss and added:
    I love Ramen. As long as I have enough cash for that, & gas to get to the next show, you’ll find me on the road.
  12. longgoneloser reblogged this from deathwishinc and added:
    This is good reading. Been there, received the same kind of criticism. It’s all fucked.
  13. jaykaybeethree reblogged this from attheageofdecay and added:
    Desperately awaiting the day when I can launch myself headfirst into music despite all this. And by “the day,” I mean...
  14. empirenc reblogged this from deathwishinc
  15. boner-awareness-league-squad reblogged this from attheageofdecay
  16. attheageofdecay reblogged this from oldgravesdiggingthenew
  17. furnaceband reblogged this from deathwishinc
  18. xahhx reblogged this from deathwishinc
  19. catiev reblogged this from noreliefnorest
  20. noreliefnorest reblogged this from deathwishinc
  21. anycoloriwant reblogged this from selfdefensefamily and added:
    very interesting.